M51 (NGC5194) and NGC5195
Constellation: Canes Venatici
RA: 13h 29.880m
Dec: +47 Degrees 12 Minutes
Distance: 15 million Ly
Magnitude: 8.4
Size: 11.2’ x 6.9’
Dates: 02 July 2007 to 04 August 2007
Location: The Dark Horse Observatory
Luminance: 12 10-minute frames
Red: 09 10-minute frames
Green: 08 10-minute frames
Blue: 09 10-minute frames
Total: 380 minutes (6 1/3 hours)
Equipment:
Telescope: BRC-250
CCD: SBIG ST-10XME
Filterwheel: SBIG CFW-10
Filters: Astrodon Series E
Focuser:
Rotator: Optec Pyxis 2 inch Rotator
Mount: Mountain Instruments MI-250 with Gemini Level 4
Pier: Pier-Tech 3 Pier
Software:
CDDAutopilot 3
Maxim DL
FocusMax
The Sky 6
Image Processing:
CCDStack
Adobe PhotoShop CS3
Russell Croman’s Gradient Xterminator
Noel Carboni’s PhotoShop Tools
Kodak GEM noise reduction Plug-in
Picture Code’s Noise Ninja
Name: IC 342 (UGC 2847)
Type: Galaxy – SABcd type
Constellation: Camelopardalis Exposure Time
RA: 03 hours 46.8 minutes Luminance: 10 min. (20) – 200 min.
Dec: +68 degrees 06 minutes Red: 10 min. (12) – 120 min.
Distance: 6.5 - 10 million light years Green: 10 min. (16) – 160 min.
Magnitude: 9.1 mag Blue: 10 min. (09) – 090 min.
Size: 21.4 x 20.9 arc minutes
15 min. (09) – 135 min.
Imaging Dates: 13 – 21 October 2007 Total Time: 11.75 hrs.
Location: Dark Horse Observatory
Telescope: BRC-250 Mount: MI-250 (Gemini 1.04)
Focuser: FLI DF2 Rotator: Optec Pyxis (2”)
CCD: SBIG ST-10XME Filterwheel: SBIG CFW-10
Filters: Astrodon Series E
Software:
Acquisition: Processing:
MaximDL v 1.45 CCDStack: calibration & bloom removal
FocusMax MiraPro: image registration
The Sky 6 CCDStack: stacking and RGB combine
CCSAutoPilot3 PS CS3: Levels & curves
RC Gradient Xterminator
Kodak GEM noise reduction
Noel Carboni’s Photoshop Tools
I have been planning on imaging IC 342 for about one year since I first read about it. I knew that it would be a great challenge to my skills due to the dust clouds and the green and blue attenuation. I started gathering what I thought was sufficient exposure time and made an attempt to process it. Although the luminance was promising, the RGB result had almost no S:R ration in the blue channel and barely enough in the green channel. Then I saw several excellent versions (including Dan’s, Bob’s, Giovanni’s, and Jay’s) that were posted on the Yahoo groups. Each of these is different, but each was good. I was encouraged to go back and make another attempt to salvage my original attempt. I decided that I needed more color data especially in the blue channel so I went back this weekend to gather more color data. I decided to go for 15 minute subs in the blue channel to improve the S:N ratio. While the galaxy has come out much more blue I did not change the combine ratio from what I used for other objects.